Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Systematic review of machine-learning models in orthopaedic trauma
14
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
The results of this study showed that despite a myriad of potential clinically useful applications, a substantial part of ML studies in orthopaedic trauma lack transparent reporting, and are at high risk of bias. These problems must be resolved by following established guidelines to instil confidence in ML models among patients and clinicians. Otherwise, there will remain a sizeable gap between the development of ML prediction models and their clinical application in our day-to-day orthopaedic trauma practice.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews
2015 · 7.170 Zit.
An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures
2006 · 4.597 Zit.
Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis
2014 · 4.025 Zit.
Incidence and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis-Related Fractures in the United States, 2005–2025
2006 · 3.997 Zit.
Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient
2016 · 3.847 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- University Medical Center Groningen(NL)
- University of Groningen(NL)
- Harvard University(US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital(US)
- University Medical Center Utrecht(NL)
- Utrecht University(NL)
- Candid(US)
- Delft University of Technology(NL)
- Marymount University(US)
- Orthopaedic Research(GB)
- Flinders University(AU)
- Flinders Medical Centre(AU)