Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Harnessing Reliable Evidence in the Post-COVID Era: A Practice Guide to Navigating the Ocean of Medical Literature
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
The reliability and relevance of medical literature are significant concerns in the post-COVID-19 era, where misinformation and disinformation are serious threats. This practice guide provides an overview of practical strategies to appraise the reliability of research publications critically. These strategies include critically appraising the effectiveness and constraints of various approaches to disseminating medical information, choosing appropriate medical literature resources, navigating library databases, screening the literature from the search, and screening individual publications. We also discuss the importance of considering study limitations and the relevance of the results in research or use in the medical arena. In-depth, critical appraisal of medical or clinical research evidence requires expertise, insight into research methodologies, and a grasp of issues in each field. By harnessing the wealth of reliable and relevant information available in medical literature through the above steps, we can alleviate potentially misleading information and stay at the forefront of our respective fields.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.806 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.811 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.529 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
2009 · 45.121 Zit.
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
2009 · 27.679 Zit.