Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Can I trust my fake data – A comprehensive quality assessment framework for synthetic tabular data in healthcare
43
Zitationen
10
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Despite the growing emphasis on algorithmic fairness and carbon footprint, these metrics were scarce in the literature review. The overwhelming focus was on statistical similarity using distance metrics while sequential logic detection was scarce. A consensus-backed framework that includes all relevant quality dimensions can provide assurance for safe and responsible real-life applications of synthetic data. As the choice of appropriate metrics are highly context dependent, further research is needed on validation studies to guide metric choices and support the development of technical standards.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
1986 · 38.733 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 37.535 Zit.
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
2018 · 37.057 Zit.
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
2011 · 33.449 Zit.
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
2019 · 28.303 Zit.