SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF CHATGPT IN RESEARCH AND ACADEMIC WRITING

Abstract

Background: ChatGPT has proven to be an invaluable tool, enabling human-like interactions, and facilitating knowledge exchange. It possesses the ability to generate coherent and contextually relevant responses based on the input it receives. In essence, ChatGPT responds to anything in a conversational manner and provides an output that looks like human writing. However, with the rapid advancement of medical research, there is an increasing concern that ChatGPT may be abused to create articles devoid of clinical reasoning and critical thinking. METHODS: A through literature search was conducted on PubMed and Google scholar to find relevant article according to objective. RESULTS: Relevant articles were critically analyzed and ChatGPT was proven to be an invaluable tool, enabling human-like interactions, and facilitating knowledge exchange. Although ChatGPT may produce excellent scientific content, its correctness, and integrity in academic writing have been questioned because the material it provides comprises both true and fabricated stuff. Like any technology, ChatGPT possesses both a vast scope and inherent limitations that must be acknowledged and understood to ensure its responsible use. Conclusion: By recognizing and addressing challenges with the it’s use, we can unlock the true potential of ChatGPT while ensuring its responsible and ethical use, ultimately leveraging AI to benefit society at large. As AI continues to evolve, ongoing research and responsible development are imperative to unlock the true potential of conversational AI and foster a more beneficial and inclusive future.

Ähnliche Arbeiten