Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Patient-Centric Skill Evaluation in IoT-Based Surgical Training with Naive Bayes Algorithm for Personalized Feedback
1
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) technology has established essential in advancing surgical training, enabling more individualized and patient-centric methods. This paper proposes a unique framework for skill assessment in surgical training, concentrating on individualized feedback using the Naive Bayes algorithm. With the use of IoT technology, surgical simulators can now collect real-time data on trainee performance while also communicating patient-centric factors into account. The data is analyzed using the suggested Naive Bayes Algorithm, which places an emphasis on providing personalized feedback to individuals. The objective of this method is to improve surgical outcomes while simultaneously increasing surgeons’ technical competence. The trainee’s abilities are evaluated in a variety of ways by the algorithm, which takes into account accuracy, recall, and other metrics. It provides to the continuing attempts to establish more efficient and individualized training procedures using IoT-based surgical training combined with machine learning approaches. These results demonstrate the promise of the Naive Bayes algorithm for improving surgical outcomes via the delivery of actionable, personalized feedback to surgeons.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The SCARE 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) Guidelines
2020 · 5.571 Zit.
Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance
2002 · 2.783 Zit.
An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data
2008 · 2.504 Zit.
Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents
1997 · 2.256 Zit.
Does Simulation-Based Medical Education With Deliberate Practice Yield Better Results Than Traditional Clinical Education? A Meta-Analytic Comparative Review of the Evidence
2011 · 1.704 Zit.