Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Comment on “Comparing the Performance of College Chemistry Students with ChatGPT for Calculations Involving Acids and Bases”
19
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
In a recent paper in this Journal ( J. Chem. Educ. 2023, 100, 3934−3944), Clark et al. evaluated the performance of the GPT-3.5 large language model (LLM) on ten undergraduate pH calculation problems. They reported that GPT-3.5 gave especially poor results for salt and titration problems, returning the correct results only 10% and 0% of the time, respectively, and that, despite a correct application of heuristics, the LLM made mathematical errors and used flawed strategies. However, these problems are partially mitigated using the more advanced GPT-4 model and entirely corrected using simple prompting and calculator tool use patterns demonstrated herein.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis
2004 · 46.987 Zit.
AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading
2009 · 35.406 Zit.
Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen
1989 · 31.278 Zit.
The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals
2007 · 29.303 Zit.
<i>VESTA 3</i> for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data
2011 · 24.041 Zit.