Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Compliance and satisfaction with BRCA surveillance in specialized clinics versus community follow-up
0
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess adherence to medical follow-up protocols among BRCA1/2 carriers and compare outcomes between dedicated carrier clinics and community healthcare settings. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted by distributing an anonymous questionnaire within the 'Good BRCA Genes - Support and Information Group for BRCA Carriers' association. The questionnaire assessed adherence to recommended surveillance and satisfaction with various aspects of the follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 682 BRCA carriers surveyed, 68.5% reported fully adhering to recommended medical follow-up. Those not fully adhering cited bureaucracy challenges, scheduling difficulties, timing uncertainties, and difficulty remembering examination dates. Less than 50% were satisfied with appointment availability, scheduling, contact persons, and general practitioners' knowledge of BRCA carrier risks and follow-up. The 417 women monitored in dedicated breast clinics reported notably higher optimal adherence to recommended surveillance (78.3 vs. 53.6%, P < 0.0001). In addition, they noted greater satisfaction with appointment availability (63.7 vs. 25.0%, P < 0.0001), appointment scheduling process (58.1 vs. 24.7%, P < 0.0001), availability of breast surgeons/gynecology specialists (67.4 vs. 50.8%, P < 0.0001), and availability of a contact person for consultations between appointments (53.5 vs. 20.8%, P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Our findings highlight the advantages of surveillance in dedicated BRCA1/2 clinics, including closer monitoring and increased satisfaction. Given the limited availability of such clinics and the growing number of BRCA1/2 carriers, the opening of additional dedicated clinics and the consideration of alternative surveillance-enhancing solutions, such as training healthcare professionals, using digital tools, and employing artificial intelligence, are essential.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology
2015 · 31.701 Zit.
International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature
2020 · 6.882 Zit.
A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast Cancer
2002 · 6.513 Zit.
Impact of Informing Overweight Individuals about the Role of Genetics in Obesity: An Online Experimental Study
2013 · 6.093 Zit.
A Strong Candidate for the Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility Gene <i>BRCA1</i>
1994 · 6.091 Zit.