Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews of “Performance Drift in Machine Learning Models for Cardiac Surgery Risk Prediction: Retrospective Analysis”
0
Zitationen
11
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Overall, I think this is a really interesting paper [2].It is a concept I had never heard of, and I can see very clearly how this is an important consideration.I also think the authors have done excellently to consider a host of different aspects, including feature importance change, beyond the most obvious measurements.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Classification of Surgical Complications
2004 · 30.229 Zit.
2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
2013 · 13.648 Zit.
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
2010 · 13.439 Zit.
Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure
2003 · 13.234 Zit.
2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure
2013 · 12.586 Zit.