Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
A survey on UK researchers’ views regarding their experiences with the de-identification, anonymisation, release methods and re-identification risk estimation for clinical trial datasets
4
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
The majority of responders reported using documented processes for de-identification and anonymisation. However, our survey results clearly indicate that there are still gaps in the areas of guidance, resources and training to fulfil sharing requests of de-identified/anonymised datasets, and that re-identification risk estimation is an underdeveloped area.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
2003 · 10.819 Zit.
Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample
2005 · 8.929 Zit.
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
2013 · 6.943 Zit.
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
2020 · 5.221 Zit.
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.504 Zit.