Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Integrating Robot-Assisted Surgery and AI for Improved Healthcare Outcomes
38
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
One of the numerous possible advantages of integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) with Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS) in the operating theatre is improved surgical accuracy and patient outcomes. We carried out a thorough investigation here to better comprehend this overlap. The study used a rigorous methodology that focused on making up information while collecting, analyzing, and testing data. The adoption of AI-driven Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) was linked to a statistically significant drop in surgical problem rates across all surgical groups, with a mean rate of around 14.36%, in a descriptive analysis of surgical complication rates. These findings demonstrate the potential therapeutic value of integrating RAS and AI. The goal is to shape a healthcare landscape that is characterized by precision, efficiency, personalization, and universal access to cutting-edge healthcare technologies, and the way forward includes rigorous clinical validation, AI model refinement, interdisciplinary collaboration, ethical considerations, costeffectiveness analysis, and a commitment to global accessibility. The combination of RAS and AI has the potential to revolutionize surgical procedures and improve health outcomes for people all across the world.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The SCARE 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) Guidelines
2020 · 5.571 Zit.
Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance
2002 · 2.782 Zit.
An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data
2008 · 2.503 Zit.
Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents
1997 · 2.256 Zit.
Does Simulation-Based Medical Education With Deliberate Practice Yield Better Results Than Traditional Clinical Education? A Meta-Analytic Comparative Review of the Evidence
2011 · 1.701 Zit.