Survival After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Development of a Fair Machine Learning Model (Preprint)

Abstract

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Prediction models based on machine learning (ML) methods are being increasingly developed and adopted in health care. However, these models may be prone to bias and considered unfair if they demonstrate variable performance in population subgroups. An unfair model is of particular concern in bladder cancer, where disparities have been identified in sex and racial subgroups. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aims (1) to develop a ML model to predict survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and evaluate for potential model bias in sex and racial subgroups; and (2) to compare algorithm unfairness mitigation techniques to improve model fairness. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We trained and compared various ML classification algorithms to predict 5-year survival after radical cystectomy using the National Cancer Database. The primary model performance metric was the &lt;i&gt;F&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt;-score. The primary metric for model fairness was the equalized odds ratio (eOR). We compared 3 algorithm unfairness mitigation techniques to improve eOR. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> We identified 16,481 patients; 23.1% (n=3800) were female, and 91.5% (n=15,080) were “White,” 5% (n=832) were “Black,” 2.3% (n=373) were “Hispanic,” and 1.2% (n=196) were “Asian.” The 5-year mortality rate was 75% (n=12,290). The best naive model was extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), which had an &lt;i&gt;F&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt;-score of 0.860 and eOR of 0.619. All unfairness mitigation techniques increased the eOR, with correlation remover showing the highest increase and resulting in a final eOR of 0.750. This mitigated model had &lt;i&gt;F&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt;-scores of 0.86, 0.904, and 0.824 in the full, Black male, and Asian female test sets, respectively. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> The ML model predicting survival after radical cystectomy exhibited bias across sex and racial subgroups. By using algorithm unfairness mitigation techniques, we improved algorithmic fairness as measured by the eOR. Our study highlights the role of not only evaluating for model bias but also actively mitigating such disparities to ensure equitable health care delivery. We also deployed the first web-based fair ML model for predicting survival after radical cystectomy. </sec>

Ähnliche Arbeiten