Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Comparison of machine learning models to predict complications of bariatric surgery: A systematic review
4
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
<b>Background and aim:</b> Due to changes in lifestyle, bariatric surgery is expanding worldwide. However, this surgery has numerous complications, and early identification of these complications could be essential in assisting patients to have a higher-quality surgery. Machine learning has a significant role in prediction tasks. So far, no systematic review has been carried out on leveraging ML techniques for predicting complications of bariatric surgery. Therefore, this study aims to perform a systematic review for better prediction insight. <b>Materials and methods:</b> This review was conducted in 2023 based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). We searched scientific databases using the inclusion and exclusion criteria to obtain articles. The data extraction form was used to gather data. To analyze the data, we leveraged the narrative synthesis of the quantitative data. <b>Results:</b> Ensemble algorithms outperformed others in large databases, especially at the national registries. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) performed better than others based on one-single-center database. Also, Deep Belief Networks (DBN) and ANN obtained favorable performance for complications such as diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, thrombosis, leakage, and depression. <b>Conclusion:</b> This review gave us insight into using ensemble and non-ensemble algorithms based on the types of datasets and complications.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
2008 · 29.049 Zit.
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
1987 · 16.123 Zit.
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.755 Zit.
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
2011 · 10.828 Zit.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
2010 · 9.124 Zit.