Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Predictive Models for Sustained, Uncontrolled Hypertension and Hypertensive Crisis Based on Electronic Health Record Data: Algorithm Development and Validation
2
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Background: Assessing disease progression among patients with uncontrolled hypertension is important for identifying opportunities for intervention. Objective: We aim to develop and validate 2 models, one to predict sustained, uncontrolled hypertension (≥2 blood pressure [BP] readings ≥140/90 mm Hg or ≥1 BP reading ≥180/120 mm Hg) and one to predict hypertensive crisis (≥1 BP reading ≥180/120 mm Hg) within 1 year of an index visit (outpatient or ambulatory encounter in which an uncontrolled BP reading was recorded). Methods: Data from 142,897 patients with uncontrolled hypertension within Atrium Health Greater Charlotte in 2018 were used. Electronic health record-based predictors were based on the 1-year period before a patient's index visit. The dataset was randomly split (80:20) into a training set and a validation set. In total, 4 machine learning frameworks were considered: L2-regularized logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, gradient boosting machines, and random forest. Model selection was performed with 10-fold cross-validation. The final models were assessed on discrimination (C-statistic), calibration (eg, integrated calibration index), and net benefit (with decision curve analysis). Additionally, internal-external cross-validation was performed at the county level to assess performance with new populations and summarized using random-effect meta-analyses. Results: In internal validation, the C-statistic and integrated calibration index were 0.72 (95% CI 0.71-0.72) and 0.015 (95% CI 0.012-0.020) for the sustained, uncontrolled hypertension model, and 0.81 (95% CI 0.79-0.82) and 0.009 (95% CI 0.007-0.011) for the hypertensive crisis model. The models had higher net benefit than the default policies (ie, treat-all and treat-none) across different decision thresholds. In internal-external cross-validation, the pooled performance was consistent with internal validation results; in particular, the pooled C-statistics were 0.70 (95% CI 0.69-0.71) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.78-0.81) for the sustained, uncontrolled hypertension model and hypertensive crisis model, respectively. Conclusions: An electronic health record-based model predicted hypertensive crisis reasonably well in internal and internal-external validations. The model can potentially be used to support population health surveillance and hypertension management. Further studies are needed to improve the ability to predict sustained, uncontrolled hypertension.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure<SUBTITLE>The JNC 7 Report</SUBTITLE>
2003 · 25.523 Zit.
Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum Creatinine
1976 · 15.374 Zit.
2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
2013 · 13.663 Zit.
Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure
2003 · 13.259 Zit.
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
2017 · 12.699 Zit.