Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Validation requirements for AI-based intervention-evaluation in aging and longevity research and practice
9
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
The field of aging and longevity research is overwhelmed by vast amounts of data, calling for the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), including Large Language Models (LLMs), for the evaluation of geroprotective interventions. Such evaluations should be correct, useful, comprehensive, explainable, and they should consider causality, interdisciplinarity, adherence to standards, longitudinal data and known aging biology. In particular, comprehensive analyses should go beyond comparing data based on canonical biomedical databases, suggesting the use of AI to interpret changes in biomarkers and outcomes. Our requirements motivate the use of LLMs with Knowledge Graphs and dedicated workflows employing, e.g., Retrieval-Augmented Generation. While naive trust in the responses of AI tools can cause harm, adding our requirements to LLM queries can improve response quality, calling for benchmarking efforts and justifying the informed use of LLMs for advice on longevity interventions.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment
2005 · 24.564 Zit.
Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype
2001 · 23.796 Zit.
The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease
2011 · 18.504 Zit.
Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis
2010 · 11.558 Zit.
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission
2020 · 9.769 Zit.