Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
The Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence in the Detection and Management of Atrial Fibrillation
4
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into medicine offers transformative potential, particularly in the detection and management of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the intersection of AI and AF has not been comprehensively evaluated. This systematic review focuses specifically on the applications of AI in AF risk prediction, monitoring, and management. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar using terms such as artificial intelligence, deep learning, machine learning, artificial neural networks, and AF diagnosis. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. Of the 109 studies screened, 39 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 19 studies focused on AI's role in AF risk prediction, while 20 studies addressed its application in monitoring and management. Machine learning models, including AI-ECG approaches such as the optimal time-varying machine learning model and the observational medical outcomes partnership common data model, demonstrated superior sensitivity and specificity compared to traditional models (Framingham, atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC), congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75, diabetes, stroke, vascular disease (CHADS-VASc), and cohorts for heart and aging research in genomic epidemiology model for atrial fibrillation (CHARGE-AF). Wearable devices, such as patch monitors and smartwatches, emerged as reliable, cost-effective, and noninvasive alternatives to implantable cardiac monitors for continuous AF detection and patient-centered management. Despite these advances, the reliability and consistency of AI-based tools remain variable across studies due to data heterogeneity and methodological inconsistencies. Identified gaps include the need for standardized, labeled datasets, robust validation through prospective clinical trials, and improved data governance frameworks to ensure reliability and reproducibility. In conclusion, AI holds immense potential for AF prediction and management, but addressing these challenges is essential for its integration into clinical practice.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Aspirin plus Clopidogrel as Secondary Prevention after Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
2014 · 11.546 Zit.
Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
2009 · 11.135 Zit.
2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)
2020 · 9.722 Zit.
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation
2017 · 9.611 Zit.
Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
2011 · 9.326 Zit.