Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
TotalSegmentator MRI: Robust Sequence-independent Segmentation of Multiple Anatomic Structures in MRI
54
Zitationen
19
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Background Since the introduction of TotalSegmentator CT, there has been demand for a similar robust automated MRI segmentation tool that can be applied across all MRI sequences and anatomic structures. Purpose To develop and evaluate an automated MRI segmentation model for robust segmentation of major anatomic structures independent of MRI sequence. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, an nnU-Net model (TotalSegmentator MRI) was trained on MRI and CT scans to segment 80 anatomic structures relevant for use cases such as organ volumetry, disease characterization, surgical planning, and opportunistic screening. Images were randomly sampled from routine clinical studies to represent real-world examples. Dice scores were calculated between the predicted segmentations and expert radiologist segmentations to evaluate model performance on an internal test set and two external test sets and against two publicly available models and TotalSegmentator CT. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare model performance. The proposed model was applied to a separate internal dataset containing abdominal MRI scans to investigate age-dependent volume changes. Results A total of 1143 scans (616 MRI, 527 CT; median patient age, 61 years [IQR, 50-72 years]) were split into a training set (<i>n</i> = 1088; CT and MRI) and an internal test set (<i>n</i> = 55; MRI only). The two external test sets (AMOS and CHAOS) contained 20 MRI scans each, and the aging-study dataset contained 8672 abdominal MRI scans (median patient age, 59 years [IQR, 45-70 years]). The proposed model had a Dice score of 0.839 for the 80 anatomic structures in the internal test set and outperformed two other models (Dice score of 0.862 vs 0.759 for 40 anatomic structures and 0.838 vs 0.560 for 13 anatomic structures; <i>P</i> < .001 for both). On the TotalSegmentator CT test set (89 CT scans), the performance of the proposed model almost matched that of TotalSegmentator CT (Dice score, 0.966 vs 0.970; <i>P</i> < .001). The aging study demonstrated a strong correlation between age and organ volume (eg, age and liver volume: ρ = -0.096; <i>P</i> < .0001). Conclusion The proposed open-source, easy-to-use model allows for automatic, robust segmentation of 80 structures, extending the capabilities of TotalSegmentator to MRI scans from any MRI sequence. The ready-to-use online tool is available at <i>https://totalsegmentator.com</i>; the model, at <i>https://github.com/wasserth/TotalSegmentator</i>; and the dataset, at <i>http://zenodo.org/records/14710732</i>. © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Kitamura in this issue.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
A Computational Approach to Edge Detection
1986 · 28.716 Zit.
Textural Features for Image Classification
1973 · 22.220 Zit.
Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain
2002 · 16.574 Zit.
Normalized cuts and image segmentation
2000 · 15.553 Zit.
Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms
1992 · 15.414 Zit.