Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
“Conversing” With Qualitative Data: Enhancing Qualitative Research Through Large Language Models (LLMs)
39
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are revolutionizing how qualitative researchers can work with textual data. Rather than relying only on codebooks or manual line-by-line analysis, scholars can “converse” with their materials by asking targeted questions, probing for contextual insights, and refining theoretical connections. This dialogue-like process speeds up traditional tasks—transcription, coding, theme identification—while sparking broader possibilities for exploration. Researchers prompt the LLM to surface recurring patterns, detect subtle shifts in tone, or suggest new interpretive angles. These capabilities neither diminish the centrality of human expertise nor replace the analytical depth that defines qualitative research. Instead, they expand the researcher’s toolkit, allowing more time for theoretical reflection and rich meaning-making. The LLM becomes an active partner: it quickly identifies connections that might take days or weeks of manual work, yet the scholar remains responsible for selecting which prompts to use, verifying the outputs, and situating them within appropriate conceptual frameworks. Ethical considerations—such as data security and bias—demand careful oversight and transparent reporting, emphasizing the importance of maintaining scholarly integrity. Taken together, LLM-facilitated analysis offer a promising avenue to enhance qualitative research, leveraging both computational efficiency and the nuanced, reflexive insights at the heart of interpretive inquiry.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
2019 · 31.376 Zit.
Techniques to Identify Themes
2003 · 5.360 Zit.
Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data
2007 · 4.050 Zit.
Basic Content Analysis
1990 · 4.044 Zit.
Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts
2013 · 3.019 Zit.