Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4 Turbo in Title and Abstract Screening for Systematic Reviews
5
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
This study demonstrated that while GPT-4 Turbo had superior specificity when compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo (0.98 vs 0.51), as well as comparable sensitivity (0.85 vs 0.83), GPT-3.5 Turbo processed 100 studies faster (0.9 min vs 1.6 min) in citation screening for systematic reviews, suggesting that GPT-4 Turbo may be more suitable due to its higher specificity and highlighting the potential of large language models in optimizing literature selection.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 87.288 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.928 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 77.350 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 63.121 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.787 Zit.