Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
TriNetX and Real-World Evidence: A Critical Review of Its Strengths, Limitations, and Bias Considerations in Clinical Research
33
Zitationen
10
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
TriNetX is a valuable resource for healthcare research. However, its limitations must be acknowledged, and future research should focus on standardizing data collection and enhancing data validation processes to mitigate platform-specific biases and improve the quality and applicability of the findings.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
1982 · 21.591 Zit.
Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data
2005 · 10.513 Zit.
Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases
1992 · 10.498 Zit.
Comorbidity Measures for Use with Administrative Data
1998 · 9.817 Zit.
Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond
2007 · 6.249 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York(US)
- Mount Sinai Queens(US)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai(US)
- West Virginia University(US)
- West Virginia University Hospitals(US)
- Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis(US)
- University of Maryland, Baltimore(US)
- University of Maryland Medical Center Midtown Campus(US)
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona(US)
- National Diabetes Obesity and Cholesterol Foundation(IN)
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine(US)
- Montefiore Medical Center(US)
- Neurological Surgery(US)