Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Artificial intelligence and the five laws: a new vision for library science
2
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Purpose This conceptual paper reinterprets S.R. Ranganathan’s five laws of library science in the context of artificial intelligence (AI), examining their continued relevance and adaptability in the digital age. By aligning AI capabilities with these foundational principles, this paper aims to explore how AI can enhance information access, optimize resource management and personalize library services while maintaining the ethical and philosophical core of Library and Information Science (LIS). Design/methodology/approach This study uses a conceptual analysis approach to critically examine AI applications in LIS, including automated cataloging, AI-driven search systems, personalized recommendations and intelligent chatbots. It also addresses ethical considerations such as algorithmic bias, data privacy and equitable access. This paper proposes an AI-enhanced reinterpretation of Ranganathan’s laws, offering a guiding framework for responsible AI adoption in libraries. Findings This study highlights the transformative potential of AI in libraries, demonstrating its ability to improve operational efficiency, user engagement and accessibility. However, it also emphasizes the necessity of aligning AI implementation with ethical principles to prevent biases and ensure inclusivity. By conceptualizing an AI-driven adaptation of Ranganathan’s laws, this paper provides a roadmap for integrating AI into library services without compromising their core values. Originality/value This research offers a novel perspective by reconceptualizing Ranganathan’s five laws in the era of AI, providing LIS professionals with a theoretical framework to guide AI integration. It contributes to the discourse on ethical and sustainable AI adoption in libraries, ensuring that technological advancements support rather than undermine traditional LIS principles.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
An Experiment in Linguistic Synthesis with a Fuzzy Logic Controller
1999 · 5.632 Zit.
An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller
1975 · 5.557 Zit.
A FRAMEWORK FOR REPRESENTING KNOWLEDGE
1988 · 4.548 Zit.
Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy
2023 · 3.325 Zit.