OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 14.03.2026, 11:48

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

Retrospective Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a New Tanner–Whitehouse-Based Bone Age Assessment Algorithm Trained with a Deep Neural Network System

2025·2 Zitationen·DiagnosticsOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

2

Zitationen

10

Autoren

2025

Jahr

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: To develop an automated deep learning-based bone age prediction model using the Tanner-Whitehouse (TW3) method and evaluate its feasibility by comparing its performance with that of pediatric radiologists. <b>Methods</b>: The hand and wrist radiographs of 560 Korean children and adolescents (280 female, 280 male, mean age 9.43 ± 2.92 years) were evaluated using the TW3-based model and three pediatric radiologists. Images with bony destruction, congenital anomalies, or non-diagnostic quality were excluded. A commercialized AI solution built upon the Rotated Single Shot MultiBox Detector (SSD) and EfficientNet-B0 was used. Bone age measurements from the model and radiologists were compared using the paired <i>t</i>-tests. Linear regression analysis was performed and the coefficient of determination (r²), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE) were measured. A Bland-Altman analysis was conducted and the proportion of bone age predictions within 0.6 years of the radiologists' assessments was calculated. <b>Results</b>: The TW3-based model demonstrated no significant differences between bone age measurements and radiologists, except for participants <6 and >13 years old (overall, <i>p</i> = 0.874; 6-8 years, <i>p</i> = 0.737; 8-9 years, <i>p</i> = 0.093; 9-10 years, <i>p</i> = 0.301; 10-11 years, <i>p</i> = 0.584; 11-13 years, <i>p</i> = 0.976; <6 or >13 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was a strong linear correlation between the model prediction and radiologist assessments (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.977). The RMSE and MAE values of the model were 0.529 (95% CI, 0.482-0.575) and 0.388 (95% CI, 0.361-0.417) years. Overall, 82.3% of bone age model predictions were within 0.6 years of the radiologists' interpretation. <b>Conclusions</b>: Automated deep learning-based bone age assessment has the potential to reduce radiologists' workload and provide standardized measurements for clinical decision making.

Ähnliche Arbeiten

Autoren

Institutionen

Themen

Body Composition Measurement TechniquesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationBone health and osteoporosis research
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen