Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Review of: "Unlocking Proficiency: Experts’ Views on the Use of Generative AI"
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
This paper tackles an incredibly timely and relevant issue: understanding what it truly means to be pro cient with Generative AI (GenAI) as a knowledge worker.The qualitative approach, using expert interviews, is spot-on for exploring this new terrain.The proposed framework of competencies, pro ciency, and bene ts (Figure 1) provides a really useful starting point for thinking about this.This paper can be a great contribution.Much of the current discussion around GenAI tests the AI itselfits capabilities or the performance it enables.As an early adopter who uses GenAI extensively in my own research, I think the paper's angle is fantastic: it shifts the focus to the user, exploring what skills or competencies we need to better leverage these powerful tools.The inclusion of interviews with recognized experts from various elds is especially bene cial, capturing front-line insights that are often missing from more theoretical discussions.Given the novelty of GenAI, this kind of information, drawn directly from real-world users, is highly valuable-perhaps even more so than synthesizing ndings from scattered literature. Some strengths:Structure and Clarity: There's strong internal consistency, with the three research questions mapping clearly to the three main parts of the results section.The literature review, the description of purposive sampling for participants, and the data analysis process are all laid out with good clarity and detail.Competency Framework: The framework for competencies is complete, distinguishing between personal traits/knowledge/skills (Competencies), how pro ciency is demonstrated (Pro ciency), and Qeios qeios.com
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.514 Zit.
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
2016 · 3.859 Zit.
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
2004 · 3.386 Zit.
Fairness through awareness
2012 · 3.269 Zit.
Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer
1987 · 3.183 Zit.