Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
ChatGPT artificial intelligence in clinical data analysis: an example comparing standard vs fusion prostate biopsy outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RaRP)
1
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
ChatGPT (version 4.0) proved reliable for statistical analysis, showing strong concordance with human statisticians (κ = 1.0) in performing logistic regression, chi-square, and ANOVA tests. The Q-EVAL tool could reduce query errors, though ChatGPT's lack of automatic citations remains a limitation. Fusion biopsy significantly lowered upstaging risk after RaRP. In conclusion, ChatGPT is a valuable assistive tool but further research is required to optimize human-AI collaboration in clinical research.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Docetaxel plus Prednisone or Mitoxantrone plus Prednisone for Advanced Prostate Cancer
2004 · 5.691 Zit.
Decision Curve Analysis: A Novel Method for Evaluating Prediction Models
2006 · 5.033 Zit.
Increased Survival with Enzalutamide in Prostate Cancer after Chemotherapy
2012 · 4.526 Zit.
Biochemical Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, or Interstitial Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
1998 · 4.482 Zit.
Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European Study
2009 · 3.986 Zit.