Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Driven Approaches to Manage Postoperative Pain, Anxiety, and Psychological Outcomes in Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review
6
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Postoperative pain, anxiety, and psychological distress significantly impact surgical recovery, yet conventional management strategies often lack personalization. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool in perioperative care, offering potential solutions through predictive analytics, real-time monitoring, and tailored interventions. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on AI-driven approaches for improving postoperative pain, anxiety, and psychological outcomes in surgical patients. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to April 2025. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (ROB 2) and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for non-randomized studies. Data were narratively synthesized by AI applications (e.g., nociception monitoring, robotics, machine learning (ML)) and outcomes (pain, anxiety, psychological metrics). AI interventions demonstrated efficacy in reducing postoperative pain (e.g., nociception level (NOL)-guided analgesia lowered pain scores by 33% vs. standard care) and anxiety (e.g., interactive robots reduced pediatric preoperative anxiety). ML models predicted pain severity (area under the curve (AUC) up to 0.75) and complications (AUC 0.84) but showed lower accuracy for readmissions (AUC 0.66). Automated psychological interventions reduced opioid use by 36.5%. Limitations included small sample sizes (12 to 201 participants), heterogeneity in AI methods, and short follow-up durations. AI shows promise in personalizing perioperative care, particularly for pain and anxiety management, though standardization and larger trials are needed. Future research should prioritize robust validation, long-term outcomes, and integration into clinical workflows to translate AI's potential into routine practice.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Classification of Surgical Complications
2004 · 30.256 Zit.
2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
2013 · 13.651 Zit.
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
2010 · 13.449 Zit.
Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure
2003 · 13.235 Zit.
2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure
2013 · 12.586 Zit.