Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Multimodal LLMs for retinal disease diagnosis via OCT: few-shot versus single-shot learning
9
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Background and aim: Multimodal large language models (LLMs) have shown potential in processing both text and image data for clinical applications. This study evaluated their diagnostic performance in identifying retinal diseases from optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Methods: We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet 3.5 using two public OCT datasets (OCTID, OCTDL) containing expert-labeled images of four pathological conditions and normal retinas. Both models were tested using single-shot and few-shot prompts, with an overall of 3088 models' API calls. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate differences in overall and condition-specific performance. Results: < 0.001). Condition-specific analyses revealed similar trends, with absolute improvements ranging from 2% to 64%. These findings were consistent across the validation dataset. Conclusion: Few-shot prompted multimodal LLMs show promise for clinical integration, particularly in identifying normal retinas, which could help streamline referral processes in primary care. While these models fall short of the diagnostic accuracy reported in established deep learning literature, they offer simple, effective tools for assisting in routine retinal disease diagnosis. Future research should focus on further validation and integrating clinical text data with imaging.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Optical Coherence Tomography
1991 · 13.634 Zit.
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs
2016 · 7.340 Zit.
YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement
2018 · 5.887 Zit.
Diabetic Retinopathy
1974 · 5.618 Zit.
Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2014 · 5.152 Zit.