Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Revised Preferred Reporting of Case Series in Surgery (PROCESS) Guideline: An Update for the Age of Artificial Intelligence
39
Zitationen
9
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare and scientific publishing. Reporting guidelines need to be updated to take this advancement into account. The PROCESS Guideline 2025 update adds a new AI-focused domain to promote transparency, reproducibility, and ethical integrity in surgical case series involving AI. METHODS A Delphi consensus exercise was conducted to update the PROCESS guidelines. The panel comprised 49 surgical and scientific experts, who were invited to rate proposed new items. In Round 1, participants scored each item on a nine-point Likert scale and provided feedback. Items not meeting consensus were revised or discarded. RESULTS A 92% response rate occurred amongst participants (45/49) in the first round. Ratings were analyzed for agreement levels, and consensus was reached on all six proposed AI-related items. A revised PROCESS checklist is presented, which incorporates these new AI-related items. Authors are now expected to disclose AI involvement not only in patient care but also in manuscript preparation, as exemplified by this paper. CONCLUSION The PROCESS 2025 guideline provides an up-to-date framework for surgical case series in the era of AI. Through a robust consensus process, we have added specific reporting criteria for AI to ensure that any use of AI in a case series is clearly documented, explained, and discussed, including considerations of bias and ethics. This update will help maintain the quality, transparency, and clinical relevance of the case series, ultimately improving their educational value and trustworthiness for the surgical community.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.698 Zit.
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
2008 · 24.995 Zit.
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
2008 · 20.964 Zit.
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network
1998 · 16.869 Zit.
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
1996 · 15.506 Zit.