Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Best Practices and Checklist for Reviewing Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Imaging Papers: Classification
3
Zitationen
20
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) methodologies and their application to medical imaging has led to an explosion of related research programs utilizing AI to produce state-of-the-art classification performance. Ideally, research culminates in dissemination of the findings in peer-reviewed journals. To date, acceptance or rejection criteria are often subjective; however, reproducible science requires reproducible review. The Machine Learning Education Sub-Committee of the Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM) has identified a knowledge gap and need to establish guidelines for reviewing these studies. This present work, written from the machine learning practitioner standpoint, follows a similar approach to our previous paper related to segmentation. In this series, the committee will address best practices to follow in AI-based studies and present the required sections with examples and discussion of requirements to make the studies cohesive, reproducible, accurate, and self-contained. This entry in the series focuses on image classification. Elements like dataset curation, data pre-processing steps, reference standard identification, data partitioning, model architecture, and training are discussed. Sections are presented as in a typical manuscript. The content describes the information necessary to ensure the study is of sufficient quality for publication consideration and, compared with other checklists, provides a focused approach with application to image classification tasks. The goal of this series is to provide resources to not only help improve the review process for AI-based medical imaging papers, but to facilitate a standard for the information that should be presented within all components of the research study.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
2008 · 28.817 Zit.
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
1987 · 16.123 Zit.
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.514 Zit.
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
2011 · 10.745 Zit.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
2010 · 9.103 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo(BR)
- Palo Alto Institute(US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign(US)
- Addex Therapeutics (Switzerland)(CH)
- Singularity University(US)
- Microsoft (United States)(US)
- New York University(US)
- Emory University(US)
- i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto(PT)
- Johns Hopkins University(US)
- University of California, San Francisco(US)
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia(US)
- Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh(US)
- De La Salle University(PH)
- Hospital Selayang(MY)
- General Electric (Spain)(ES)
- Healthcare Global Enterprises(IN)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center(US)
- Cornell University(US)
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona(US)