Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Research on AI-driven innovations and services in academic libraries: A bibliometric and systematic literature review
1
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
ABSTRACT Purpose This study aims to analyze academic research on Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications and tools in academic libraries, focusing on publications from the Scopus database between 2014 and 2024. Design/methodology/approach The study adheres to the PRISMA protocol, using VOSviewer, Bibliometrix, and Rstudio’s Biblioshiny function for bibliographic analysis and visualization. Findings The study highlights how the potential of AI in academic libraries may be increased by changing user needs and technical advancements. It comprises four thematic clusters: foundational technologies (machine learning, natural language processing, and automation), emerging innovations (generative AI), user-centric applications (chatbots), and the importance of AI literacy. It also reveals research gaps in automation and strategic AI integration, providing recommendations for improving library services. Research limitations The study is limited to articles published between 2014 and 2024 in the Scopus database, potentially excluding previous foundational work and research from other sources. Practical implications The study offers policymakers and library practitioners insightful information on effectively utilizing AI tools. This may result in overlooking earlier foundational work and research from multiple sources. Originality/value The study discovers the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in modernizing academic libraries, identifying research gaps, and providing strategic insights to improve technology and user experience.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
An Experiment in Linguistic Synthesis with a Fuzzy Logic Controller
1999 · 5.632 Zit.
An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller
1975 · 5.568 Zit.
A FRAMEWORK FOR REPRESENTING KNOWLEDGE
1988 · 4.551 Zit.
Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy
2023 · 3.399 Zit.