Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Artificial Intelligence in Public Health Surveillance: A Cross-Disciplinary Assessment of Predictive Analytics and Ethical Concerns
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized various sectors, and public health surveillance is no exception. With the increasing frequency of global health threats, there is a growing reliance on AI-driven predictive analytics to detect, monitor, and respond to disease outbreaks in real-time. This paper explores the effectiveness, challenges, and ethical implications of integrating AI into public health surveillance systems. The research adopts a cross-disciplinary perspective involving medical professionals, epidemiologists, and public health administrators to holistically examine AI’s role in early outbreak detection, pattern recognition, and health data management. A mixed-methods approach was employed, incorporating quantitative data from structured questionnaires and qualitative insights through case studies. Participants were drawn from government health departments, research institutions, and AI solution vendors. The questionnaire consisted of five key questions assessing AI adoption, trustworthiness, security, predictive capability, and ethical oversight. The responses indicated a high degree of optimism regarding AI's predictive strengths, with over 80% of respondents agreeing that AI improved outbreak forecasting. However, concerns regarding data privacy, algorithmic transparency, and ethical governance remain prevalent, particularly among public health administrators. A comparative case study of two regional surveillance systems—one in Kerala and another in Madhya Pradesh—further illustrates the disparity in AI readiness and policy frameworks. Kerala’s system, which leverages AI for real- time dengue and COVID-19 tracking, showed efficient and ethically sound practices. In contrast, Madhya Pradesh's implementation faced delays, data inconsistencies, and ethical ambiguity due to insufficient regulatory backing and infrastructure. The study highlights that while AI holds immense potential in enhancing surveillance efficacy, its deployment must be accompanied by robust ethical guidelines, stakeholder education, and context-specific adaptation. Without these, AI tools risk eroding public trust, misrepresenting vulnerable populations, and exacerbating existing health inequalities. Therefore, policy frameworks must prioritize transparency, fairness, and inclusivity in AI development and deployment. The paper concludes with strategic recommendations for ethical AI integration into public health systems, emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration, continuous monitoring, and community-level engagement to realize the full promise of AI in healthcare surveillance.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
2003 · 10.819 Zit.
Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample
2005 · 8.928 Zit.
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
2013 · 6.943 Zit.
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
2020 · 5.220 Zit.
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.504 Zit.