Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Fine-tuned large language model for classifying CT-guided interventional radiology reports
0
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
BackgroundManual data curation was necessary to extract radiology reports due to the ambiguities of natural language.PurposeTo develop a fine-tuned large language model that classifies computed tomography (CT)-guided interventional radiology reports into technique categories and to compare its performance with that of the readers.Material and MethodsThis retrospective study included patients who underwent CT-guided interventional radiology between August 2008 and November 2024. Patients were chronologically assigned to the training (n = 1142; 646 men; mean age = 64.1 ± 15.7 years), validation (n = 131; 83 men; mean age = 66.1 ± 16.1 years), and test (n = 332; 196 men; mean age = 66.1 ± 14.8 years) datasets. In establishing a reference standard, reports were manually classified into categories 1 (drainage), 2 (lesion biopsy within fat or soft tissue density tissues), 3 (lung biopsy), and 4 (bone biopsy). The bi-directional encoder representation from the transformers model was fine-tuned with the training dataset, and the model with the best performance in the validation dataset was selected. The performance and required time for classification in the test dataset were compared between the best-performing model and the two readers.ResultsCategories 1/2/3/4 included 309/367/270/196, 30/42/40/19, and 75/124/78/55 patients for the training, validation, and test datasets, respectively. The model demonstrated an accuracy of 0.979 in the test dataset, which was significantly better than that of the readers (0.922-0.940) (<i>P</i> ≤0.012). The model classified reports within a 49.8-53.5-fold shorter time compared to readers.ConclusionThe fine-tuned large language model classified CT-guided interventional radiology reports into four categories demonstrating high accuracy within a remarkably short time.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
2008 · 28.787 Zit.
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
1987 · 16.123 Zit.
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.485 Zit.
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
2011 · 10.734 Zit.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
2010 · 9.099 Zit.