Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Addressing Academic Dishonesty in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Generative AI’s Impact
10
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) introduces new opportunities for society. While some universities have adopted GAI with a more hostile stance, others have done so with a more progressive perspective. In light of this contradiction, the main query is what is causing this controversy. The ethical issues surrounding GAI and academic dishonesty in higher education, however, are the special focus of the current study. 23 previous studies published between 2022 and 2024 served as the foundation for this systematic literature review (SLR). Three educational theories—digital innovation, diffusion of innovation, and thing ethnography—form the basis of this study. A content analysis of the research corpus was done to find important themes. The findings are synthesized by employing a novel thematic analysis approach. Research questions determine the feasibility of academic integrity in the face of plagiarism or cheating. Considering GAI, existing curricula and assessment procedures show room for modification. There are technological, institutional, or individual issues around academic dishonesty. Furthermore, problems with legitimacy and ethics are also evident. The current guidelines are consistent rather than cohesive. Based on this idea, the current researchers proposed a thorough set of guidelines for the education community. The results of this study are thought to offer comprehensive insights into addressing academic dishonesty in higher education, especially in the age of GAI. The proposed ethical framework explains how it can theoretically contribute to higher education.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications
2022 · 2.691 Zit.
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
1998 · 2.503 Zit.
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
2012 · 2.313 Zit.
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
2009 · 1.923 Zit.
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
2023 · 1.827 Zit.