Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Ability of ChatGPT to Generate Systematic Review Search Strategies Compared to a Published Search Strategy
2
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
While AI has been used in health sciences libraries for decades, the emergence of publicly available large language models (LLMs) has the potential to change how researchers conduct literature searches for systematic reviews. Using a recently published systematic review as a model, we compared the review's published Medline OVID search strategy with 3 strategies that ChatGPT created when prompted with the review's objective. Then we ran the published review and each LLM search strategy through Medline to compare the results with the articles identified by the review's authors to be important.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 85.356 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.807 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 76.967 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.814 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.530 Zit.