Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Predicting patient outcomes and risk for revision surgery after hip and knee replacement surgery: study protocol for a comparison of modelling approaches using the Swiss National Joint Registry (SIRIS)
2
Zitationen
8
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prediction of postoperative patient-reported outcomes and risk for revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can inform clinical decision-making, health resource allocation, and care planning. Machine learning (ML) algorithms are increasingly used as an alternative to traditional logistic regression (LR) prediction, but there is uncertainty about their superiority in overall model performance. The aim of this study is to compare the predictive performance of LR with different ML approaches for predicting patient outcomes and risk for revision surgery after THA and TKA. METHODS: A population-based historical cohort study will be developed using routinely collected data from all primary and revision THA and TKA procedures performed in Switzerland and registered in the Swiss National Joint Registry (SIRIS). Patients of age ≥ 18 years with surgery for primary osteoarthritis from 01 January 2015 up to 31 December 2023 will be included. Outcomes of interest will be (1) 12-month postoperative poor pain outcome (defined as < 50% improvement of pain or < 3 absolute reduction in pain on a 11-point (0 to 10) numeric rating scale) and poor satisfaction outcome, and (2) early revision within 5 years after primary surgery. Prespecified predictor variables will include demographic characteristics, comorbidity score, patient-reported health status measures, and surgical variables. Measures of overall predictive accuracy, discrimination, and calibration will be used to compare predictive performance, and decision curve analysis performed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of models. The models will be internally validated using cross-validation and externally validated using geographical validation. Development of the models will be informed by the updated Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD + AI) statement. DISCUSSION: This study will develop, validate, and compare prediction models for postoperative patient-reported outcomes and risk for revision surgery after THA and TKA using SIRIS data.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030
2007 · 6.882 Zit.
Treatment of Deep Cartilage Defects in the Knee with Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation
1994 · 5.490 Zit.
Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030
2007 · 5.431 Zit.
Rating Systems in the Evaluation of Knee Ligament Injuries
1985 · 4.559 Zit.
Rationale, of The Knee Society Clinical Rating System
1989 · 4.527 Zit.