Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Learning new surgical techniques in low and middle income countries, approval processes, and the impact of artificial intelligence
4
Zitationen
10
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Training in surgery and approval of new techniques in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), usually depends on informal apprenticeship systems, that is often lacking standardization, structured mentorship and produce inconsistent patient outcomes. These challenges are particularly severe in rural areas, where training opportunities and healthcare infrastructure are limited. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a reliable solution, providing applicable, Quantitative methods for skill development, competency evaluation and regulatory supervision. AI-powered tools, such as virtual reality (VR) simulations and tele-mentoring platforms, provide independent skill assessments and expand access to high-quality surgical education. However, implementing AI in LMICs faces some challenges, including inadequate resources, financial constraints and ethical issues related to data security and Equitable algorithms. This review compares usual surgical training and approval processes in LMICs and evaluates the promising role of AI to fill existing gaps and compares both approaches in terms of applicability, cost-effectiveness and impact on patient outcomes.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The SCARE 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) Guidelines
2020 · 5.571 Zit.
Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance
2002 · 2.782 Zit.
An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data
2008 · 2.504 Zit.
Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents
1997 · 2.256 Zit.
Does Simulation-Based Medical Education With Deliberate Practice Yield Better Results Than Traditional Clinical Education? A Meta-Analytic Comparative Review of the Evidence
2011 · 1.701 Zit.