Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Regulating Multifunctionality
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Abstract Foundation models and generative AI exacerbate a core regulatory challenge associated with AI: its heterogeneity. By their very nature, foundation models and generative AI can perform multiple functions for their users, thus presenting a vast array of different risks. This multifunctionality means that prescriptive, one-size-fits-all regulation will not be a viable option. Even performance standards and ex post liability—regulatory approaches that usually afford flexibility—are unlikely to be strong candidates for responding to multifunctional AI’s risks, given challenges in monitoring and enforcement. Regulators will do well instead to promote proactive risk management on the part of developers and users by using management-based regulation, an approach that has proven effective in other contexts of heterogeneity. Regulators will also need to maintain ongoing vigilance and agility. More than in other contexts, regulators of multifunctional AI will need sufficient resources, top human talent and leadership, and organizational cultures committed to regulatory excellence.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.640 Zit.
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
2016 · 3.878 Zit.
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
2004 · 3.465 Zit.
Fairness through awareness
2012 · 3.295 Zit.
Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer
1987 · 3.184 Zit.