Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Human Expertise in an AI-Collaborative Peer-Review Process
1
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
The implications of AI-generated peer reviews are concerning, particularly when not disclosed. If students are already turning to AI to complete academic tasks, it is not hard to imagine researchers are doing the same.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 85.457 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.813 Zit.
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
2018 · 37.235 Zit.
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
2019 · 28.405 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
2015 · 25.937 Zit.