Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
EDITORIAL Plagio, similitudes e inteligencia artificial en la evaluación de trabajos científicos.
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
The reliance on programs that measure percentages of plagiarism (based on the concept of plagiarism), similarities, or AI content—without a thorough analysis of the manuscript’s quality—reflects an editorial approach that prioritizes new technology guidelines over the actual quality of the work. Such measures should not serve as a barrier to the submission of research papers for review by qualified reviewers who can assess the quality of the report.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note
1997 · 14.568 Zit.
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha
2011 · 13.745 Zit.
QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
2011 · 13.582 Zit.
A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions
1981 · 11.464 Zit.
Evidence-Based Medicine
1992 · 4.139 Zit.