Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnostics: Clinical Performance, Workflow Impact, and Future Directions
0
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
A subset of artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning (DL) is rapidly transforming cancer detection. This review explores how artificial intelligence can enhance digital pathology's repeatability, workflow efficiency, and diagnostic accuracy by means of data integration from several studies evaluating AI systems for different tumors types. Designed to find melanoma, prostate cancer, and breast cancer metastases, artificial intelligence (AI) tools outperform human experts either exactly or slightly. Moreover, systematic reviews and reproducibility models in existence call for the imperative necessity of standardized assessment and judicious integration into clinical protocols. Despite the breakthroughs achieved, numerous issues with regard to clinical interpretability, generalizability, and ethical utilization persist and remain of major concern. Besides advancing accuracy in medical evaluations, the deployment of artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis also has the potential to diminish healthcare disparities considerably, particularly in underdeveloped or under-resourced areas. As artificial intelligence platforms evolve and enhance themselves, the prospect of them playing a positive role in patient outcomes and healthcare processes becomes more evident and realized. It should be noted, however, that oncology artificial intelligence technologies are still in their infancy stage of evolution; thus, their safe and effective use in clinical environments is contingent on rigorous validation processes and judicious consideration of ethical implications. The aim of this paper is to examine the evolving role of artificial intelligence in oncologic diagnostics, as well as in-depth analysis of its current strengths and weaknesses, benefits, and strategic long-term guidance that is necessary to facilitate stable, scalable, and equitable clinical adoption.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
2008 · 28.828 Zit.
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
1987 · 16.123 Zit.
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.521 Zit.
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
2011 · 10.748 Zit.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
2010 · 9.104 Zit.