Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
‘ChatGPT can make mistakes’ warnings fail: A randomized controlled trial
2
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
The students underweight AI's diagnostic advice. The disclaimer did not alter students' use of AI advice, suggesting that their perceived credibility of ChatGPT was already near a behavioural floor. This finding supports the existence of a credibility threshold, beyond which additional cautionary cues have limited effect. Our results refine advice-taking theory and signal that simple warnings may be insufficient to ensure calibrated trust in AI-supported learning.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note
1997 · 14.641 Zit.
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha
2011 · 13.917 Zit.
QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
2011 · 13.699 Zit.
A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions
1981 · 11.501 Zit.
Evidence-Based Medicine
1992 · 4.157 Zit.