Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
LLM evaluation for thyroid nodule assessment: comparing ACR-TIRADS, C-TIRADS, and clinician-AI trust gap
0
Zitationen
10
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
While GPT-4o demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy, clinicians most trusted DeepSeek-R1 combined with the C-TIRADS framework for generating practical, guideline-consistent recommendations. The findings highlight the critical need for alignment between AI-generated outputs and clinician expectations, and the importance of incorporating region-specific clinical guidelines (like C-TIRADS) for the effective real-world implementation of LLMs in thyroid nodule management decision support.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
2015 · 16.086 Zit.
Revised American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
2009 · 6.721 Zit.
Serum TSH, T<sub>4</sub>, and Thyroid Antibodies in the United States Population (1988 to 1994): National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III)
2002 · 3.831 Zit.
Increasing Incidence of Thyroid Cancer in the United States, 1973-2002
2006 · 3.350 Zit.
Integrated Genomic Characterization of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
2014 · 3.012 Zit.