Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Do segmentation metrics reflect clinical reality? A surgeon-centered evaluation in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy
0
Zitationen
9
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Standard quantitative metrics partially reflect surgeon perceptions but should be complemented by surgeon-informed evaluations and task-specific metrics to better capture clinically relevant errors. Aligning metric design with surgical expertise is essential for the safe and effective integration of AI-guided anatomical segmentation in the operating room.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
2008 · 28.995 Zit.
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
1987 · 16.123 Zit.
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.704 Zit.
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
2011 · 10.810 Zit.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
2010 · 9.119 Zit.