Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Valuing diagnostic AI: a structured reimbursement model for learning healthcare systems
2
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
AI-based diagnostic decision support systems (DDSS) play a growing role in modern healthcare and hold considerable promise in contributing to learning healthcare systems, settings in which clinical practice and data-driven insights are closely integrated. DDSSs are increasingly used in radiology, cardiology, laboratory diagnostics and pathology, where they assist clinicians in interpreting complex data, standardized decision making, and improving outcomes. However, despite their clinical relevance, such systems remain difficult to evaluate and integrate within current reimbursement structures. Traditional key performance indicators (KPIs), such as case costs, turnaround times, or documentation completeness, are insufficient to capture the nuanced contributions of AI systems to clinical value and learning cycles. As a result, DDSS often operate outside established reimbursement logics, limiting their broader adoption and sustainability. This article addresses the economic and regulatory disconnect between the measurable value of AI-assisted diagnostics and their lack of inclusion in existing reimbursement frameworks. It introduces a structured, point-based reimbursement model specifically designed to support the integration of DDSS into real-world payment systems, using the German and American coding systems as reference models. By linking reimbursement levels with diagnostic complexity and degree of contribution from AI, the proposed framework promotes fair compensation, encourages meaningful use, and supports responsible clinical deployment. We document a multi-criteria point calibration which is anchored to existing codes. In addition, the model fosters an auditable feedback-driven structure that could support adaptive payment in learning healthcare systems. In this way, the framework is not merely a pricing tool; it also serves as a governance mechanism that aligns economic incentives with ethical, clinical, and operational priorities in AI adoption. It contributes to the realization of a learning healthcare system by enabling continuous refinement, transparent valuation, and sustainable implementation of AI-driven diagnostics.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Human error: models and management
2000 · 5.270 Zit.
Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents
2016 · 4.406 Zit.
The Natural History of Congestive Heart Failure: The Framingham Study
1971 · 3.451 Zit.
European Committee for Standardization
2014 · 3.306 Zit.
Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts
2006 · 2.922 Zit.