Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Navigating Algorithmic Accountability and Ethical Governance in Autonomous Data Analytics Systems: Toward Transparent, Bias-Resistant, and Human-Centric AI Frameworks for Critical Decision-Making
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Intelligent data analytics systems that operate without human intervention and are powered by AI are being progressively intertwined with the decision-making processes that have a significant impact in different sectors like healthcare, finance, and criminal justice. Though these systems, in theory, make the work more efficient and insightful, their mysterious character, the possibility of algorithmic bias, and the lack of clear modes of accountability, on the other hand, expose society not only to the ethical issues but also to the social ones of considerable magnitude. This work is about the paper, which addresses the necessity of governance systems capable of regulating the situation in such a way as to ensure the responsible use of technologies, not only in terms of their development but also in terms of their deployment. I will delve deeply into the problem of algorithmic accountability from different angles, including the issue of very difficult technical audit of “black box” models and the issue of societal challenge in rectifying systemic biases embedded in training data, among other things. I come up with a full-blown, multi-layered local government model of governing TEAG, or the Tiered Ethical AI Governance Framework, combining technical instruments with the purpose of bringing about transparency and bias alleviation, together with tight procedural and organizational supervision for support. Such a human, centered approach guarantees that the self, governing systems remain compatible with ethical norms, laws, and basic human values. The integration of technical, ethical, and legal safeguards in this project reflects a shift towards the creation of AI systems that, besides being courageous and effective, are also just, clear, and answerable to the communities they exist in a deep sense.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.620 Zit.
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
2016 · 3.876 Zit.
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
2004 · 3.435 Zit.
Fairness through awareness
2012 · 3.293 Zit.
Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer
1987 · 3.184 Zit.