Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Artificial Intelligence Meets Academic Integrity: Evaluating AI Tools To Support Literature Reviews
0
Zitationen
8
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Every research project and almost every scholarly paper begins with a literature review. A growing number of artificial Intelligence (AI) tools can be used to expedite various steps of the review process, including problem formulation, literature search, screening for inclusion, quality assessment, data extraction, and data analysis and interpretation. The process of conducting literature reviews and the quality of the results obtained may vary according to the AI tools a researcher employs, however, and the academic integrity remains a paramount concern. In this symposium we bring together five panelists, each an expert in the development and/or use of some AI tools, to help establish the state-of-the-art re: AI research tools for reviews and to debate the validity, utility, and ethics involved in using them. Two discussants, well-known for their expertise regarding the effective and ethical conduct of systematic reviews, will emphasize the academic integrity and standards for rigorous and trustworthy reviews and reiterate researchers’ responsibilities in this regard. Overall, this symposium aims to describe and critique available and emergent AI tools and evaluate their alignment with the guidelines researchers must follow when conducting literature reviews.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 85.575 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.820 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 77.011 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.852 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.558 Zit.