Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) toward artificial intelligence in rehabilitation among occupational therapists: A cross-sectional online survey in Korea
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
In the healthcare field, artificial intelligence (AI) enhances diagnostic precision, optimizes treatment strategies, and enables tailored care delivery. The attitudes and acceptance of AI among healthcare professionals critically determine the rate of technological integration and practical application. This study investigates occupational therapists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning AI in rehabilitation settings, while analyzing associated influencing factors. An online survey was administered to 224 occupational therapists to evaluate their knowledge, attitudes, and practices of AI, alongside their future adoption intentions. The study further explored demographic-based disparities in these variables and assessed the relationship between each factor and adoption intent. Higher educational levels were associated with greater knowledge, more positive attitudes, and higher engagement in AI-related practices. Importantly, attitudes played a key mediating role: while knowledge and practice did not directly predict adoption intentions, both influenced intentions indirectly through attitudes. While occupational therapists generally exhibit optimism toward AI, institutional barriers - particularly insufficient organizational support and ethical frameworks - are perceived as major impediments to implementation. Effective AI adoption necessitates systemic changes, including standardized protocols, interdisciplinary training programs, and policy reforms, complementing individual mindset shifts.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 86.106 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
2015 · 25.986 Zit.
Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses
2010 · 17.171 Zit.
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 13.023 Zit.
ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS
1974 · 12.983 Zit.