Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Education: A 2025 Update on Adaptive Training, Feedback, and Competency-Based Education
2
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
In the rapidly advancing landscape of surgical education, the traditional apprenticeship model is being increasingly complemented by individualized learning, competency-based assessment, and data-driven feedback. Work-hour restrictions, administrative burdens, and limited operative exposure have intensified the need for innovative solutions to supplement faculty-led training. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising adjunct, offering scalable platforms for technical skill acquisition, personalized feedback, and structured progress tracking. Early applications include AI-guided simulation, feedback, natural language processing for resident evaluation, and advanced applicant-screening systems, which hold the potential to streamline holistic review while reducing faculty workload. Despite these advances, significant challenges remain, including bias mitigation, ethical data governance, and the need for rigorous outcome-based validation. The greatest promise lies in hybrid models, where AI augments rather than replaces mentorship, freeing faculty for complex, context-dependent teaching. With careful implementation, AI is poised to meaningfully transform surgical education worldwide.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The SCARE 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) Guidelines
2020 · 5.571 Zit.
Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance
2002 · 2.782 Zit.
An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data
2008 · 2.503 Zit.
Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents
1997 · 2.256 Zit.
Does Simulation-Based Medical Education With Deliberate Practice Yield Better Results Than Traditional Clinical Education? A Meta-Analytic Comparative Review of the Evidence
2011 · 1.701 Zit.