Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
World's first live AI‐assisted augmented reality (AR) robotic colon surgery with instrument deocclusion: Navigating the future of surgery
1
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) and augmented reality (AR) are transforming the landscape of minimally invasive surgery. We present the world's first live integration of an AI-assisted AR overlay with real-time instrument deocclusion in robotic colorectal surgery. A real surgical case of robotic right colectomy was performed using a da Vinci Xi platform enhanced by an AI-driven AR system. The technology generated three-dimensional anatomical overlays while simultaneously applying instrument deocclusion algorithms to maintain continuous visualization of critical anatomy (Video 1). The procedure was successfully completed without conversion, demonstrating the technical feasibility of combining AI-based overlays and deocclusion in a complex intraoperative environment. The system allowed stable AR guidance despite dynamic camera movements and instrument interference. From the operating surgeon's perspective, the AR overlay was useful, non-disruptive to workflow, and enhanced anatomical orientation. These impressions are preliminary and require validation in prospective studies. This proof-of-concept highlights the feasibility of AI-assisted AR with instrument deocclusion in robotic colorectal surgery and represents an important step toward digital surgery of the future. While no formal outcomes or structured user assessments were collected in this initial demonstration, future studies will focus on systematic evaluation of usability, surgeon feedback, and clinical performance metrics. Thalia Petropoulou: Conceptualization; investigation; writing – original draft; methodology; validation; visualization; writing – review and editing; formal analysis. Jente Simoens: Methodology; validation; software. Andreas Polydorou: Investigation; validation; supervision. Pieter De Backer: Conceptualization; methodology; validation; software; formal analysis; data curation. Alex Mottrie: Methodology; validation; software; supervision. The use of the AI-assisted technology was observational and did not alter the standard treatment pathway or clinical decision-making. The patient provided written informed consent for the use of anonymized clinical data, images, and videos for scientific publication and educational purposes. No identifiable patient information is presented in this manuscript. The publication of this article in OA mode was financially supported by HEAL-Link. No funding was used. No conflict of interest between the authors. This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The SCARE 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) Guidelines
2020 · 5.571 Zit.
Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance
2002 · 2.784 Zit.
An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data
2008 · 2.504 Zit.
Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents
1997 · 2.256 Zit.
Does Simulation-Based Medical Education With Deliberate Practice Yield Better Results Than Traditional Clinical Education? A Meta-Analytic Comparative Review of the Evidence
2011 · 1.704 Zit.