Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
How to report neurotechnology and artificial intelligence studies in epilepsy: Peer‐review‐inspired recommendations
0
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
We studied how researchers report studies on neurotechnology and AI in epilepsy. Many studies face problems during peer review, such as unclear methods, weak study rationale, and errors in statistics or citations. We analyzed reviewer feedback and created recommendations to improve how these studies are reported. Our goal is to help researchers develop and present their work more clearly and accurately, making it easier for others to understand and build upon their findings. This can lead to better use of AI and neurotechnology in epilepsy research and care.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis
2004 · 24.373 Zit.
FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data
2010 · 11.078 Zit.
Principles of neural science
1982 · 9.169 Zit.
Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data
2007 · 8.990 Zit.
The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks
2005 · 8.761 Zit.