Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Ethics, generative AI and science communication
0
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
In this essay, we argue that the applications of generative-AI technologies to science communication need careful consideration to ensure such uses are desirable, and socially and ethically acceptable. In early applications of GenAI in science communication, especially in public media, there has been swift and overwhelmingly negative response to news about its use. Drawing on existing literature about generative-AI in adjacent fields to science communication, and on the scholarship on the ethics of science communication, this article maps out the key ethical issues that the use of generative-AI technologies raise for science communication. Specifically, acknowledging that generative-AI is more than an output-producing technology but is a constellation of governance, infrastructure, data, human and computing operating systems, we argue that three dimensions of ethical concerns need to be explored: the communication <i>outputs</i> of generative AI; the social and environmental <i>impacts</i> of using generative AI technologies in science communication and the <i>narratives</i> we tell about AI technology.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?
2002 · 8.188 Zit.
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
2000 · 8.020 Zit.
Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts
1986 · 7.552 Zit.
The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.
1968 · 4.872 Zit.
Science for the post-normal age
1993 · 4.134 Zit.