OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 21.03.2026, 14:22

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Difficult Airways: A Review

2025·1 Zitationen·Journal of Clinical MedicineOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

1

Zitationen

3

Autoren

2025

Jahr

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Accurately predicting difficult airways is essential to ensuring patient safety in anesthesiology and emergency medicine. However, traditional assessment tools often lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity, particularly in high-pressure or resource-limited settings. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have emerged as promising tools for enhancing airway assessment. <b>Objective</b>: This review evaluates the performance of AI- and ML-based models for predicting difficult airways and compares them with traditional clinical methods. The review also analyzes the models' methodological robustness, clinical applicability, and ethical considerations. <b>Methods</b>: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify studies published between 2020 and 2025 that employed AI/ML models to predict difficult airways. Both original research and review articles were included. Key metrics, such as the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity, were extracted and compared. A qualitative analysis was performed to focus on dataset characteristics, validation strategies, model interpretability, and clinical relevance. <b>Results</b>: AI models demonstrated superior performance compared to traditional assessment tools. The MixMatch semi-supervised deep learning (DL) model achieved the highest performance (area under the curve [AUC] of 0.9435, sensitivity of 89.58%, and specificity of 90.13%). Models that used facial imaging combined with deep learning consistently outperformed those that relied solely on clinical parameters. However, methodological heterogeneity, a lack of standardized evaluation metrics, and limited population diversity impeded cross-study comparability. Few studies incorporated interpretability frameworks or addressed ethical challenges related to data privacy and algorithmic bias. <b>Conclusions</b>: AI and ML models have the potential to transform the assessment of difficult airways by improving diagnostic accuracy and enabling real-time clinical decision support.

Ähnliche Arbeiten

Autoren

Institutionen

Themen

Airway Management and Intubation TechniquesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationTracheal and airway disorders
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen